Objective: Minimally invasive surgical techniques aim at reducing the
consequences of currently used large incisions, such as bleeding, pain
, and risk of infection. Although this new approach developed rapidly
in coronary surgery, it remains questionable in mitral valve surgery.
This article reports the longest experience with minimally invasive mi
tral valve surgery, with particular attention to approach and techniqu
es, Methods: From February 1996, the date of the first case of minimal
ly invasive mitral valve reconstruction, to April 1997, 22 patients wi
th a mean age of 54 +/- 2.7 years were subjected to mitral valve surge
ry performed with less invasive techniques. Exposure of the mitral val
ve was achieved through a minithoracotomy (n = 12) or a ministernotomy
(n = 10), Video assistance was used in all cases. Peripheral arterial
cannulation (n = 21) and venous drainage (n = 22) were used in most c
ases. Results: In this series, valve surgery consisted in 19 repairs,
two replacements, and one closure of a periprosthetic leak. In two cas
es it was necessary to convert to a larger incision. The average durat
ion of cardiopulmonary bypass was 157 +/- 8.2 minutes, ventilatory ass
istance 16 +/- 4.6 hours, and intensive care unit stay 2.1 +/- 0.4 day
s, Two patients required reoperation for bleeding and another for earl
y recurrence of mitral valve regurgitation, There were no deaths and a
ll patients were discharged with normal valve function. At most recent
follow-up, all patients were in functional class I, with resumption o
f normal activity. Conclusion: Mitral valve surgery can be performed s
afely by means of less invasive techniques, but with increased technic
al difficulty. A low asymmetric median sternotomy seems preferable to
an anterior thoracotomy.