G. Possati et al., SYSTEMATIC CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS UNDERGOINGMINIMALLY INVASIVE CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 115(4), 1998, pp. 785-790
Objective: We herein analyze the results of the systematic clinical an
d angiographic control performed in a series of 77 consecutive patient
s undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass. Methods end Re
sults: From January 1995 to June 1997, 77 patients underwent minimally
invasive coronary artery bypass at our institution. There was one inh
ospital death, one noncardiac late death, and five patients had to be
reoperated for graft malfunction, A total of 76 patients underwent pos
toperative angiographic follow-up. In 66 cases (86.8%) the thoracic ar
tery graft, the target vessel, and the anastomosis were patent and fun
ctioning normally. In one case the graft was occluded, In the remainin
g nine cases the thoracic artery graft was patent but with major anoma
lies of either the anastomosis, the target vessel, or the course of th
e thoracic artery. Patients operated using especially designed instrum
ents had angiographic results clearly superior to those of patients op
erated using conventional instrumentation (perfect patency rate 100% v
s 81.8%), At a mean follow-up of 18 months, 98.5% of the surviving pat
ients are asymptomatic with negative myocardial scintigraphy, Conclusi
ons: The perfect patency rate of minimally invasive revascularization
performed without the use of dedicated instruments is unacceptably low
. The use of specific devices is likely to result in a substantial imp
rovement in the angiographic results.