Am. Scheule et al., FIBRIN SEALANT, APROTININ, AND IMMUNE-RESPONSE IN CHILDREN UNDERGOINGOPERATIONS FOR CONGENITAL HEART-DISEASE, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 115(4), 1998, pp. 883-889
Objective: Most commercially available fibrin sealants contain aprotin
in in doses of 1500 kallikrein inactivator units per milliliter. They
are used in many operative disciplines. An elevated risk of hypersensi
tivity reactions exists at reexposure to aprotinin. Our aim was to exa
mine the immunogenic potency of aprotinin as a fibrin sealant content.
Methods: We investigated 49 children with operatively treated congeni
tal heart disease. All patients received aprotinin only topically as c
ontained in fibrin sealant. Serum samples were drawn preoperatively, 1
week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and approximately 1 year after operation. The
y were analyzed for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies wit
h a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a fluorescence enzy
me immunoassay for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies. Res
ults: At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year, we found prevalences of
8% (2 of 26), 8% (2 of 24), 6% (3 of 49), and 0% for aprotinin-specif
ic Immunoglobulin E, and for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin G 8% (2
of 26), 17% (4 of 24), 39% (19 of 49), and 12% (5 of 41). The doses o
f aprotinin given did not differ significantly in antibody-negative an
d antibody-positive patients; no significant factors could predict the
immune response. Conclusions: Our findings show the existence of a su
bgroup of patients who had aprotinin-specific antibodies develop after
topical aprotinin application. Any use of aprotinin must be carefully
documented. If aprotinin use is planned in patients who previously un
derwent a surgical procedure, preexposure to aprotinin in any form mus
t be sought to avoid unexpected anaphylactic reactions. The necessity
itself and alternatives for aprotinin as a stabilizing agent in fibrin
sealants merit consideration.