T. Oshika et al., 3 YEAR PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED EVALUATION OF INTRAOCULAR-LENS IMPLANTATION THROUGH 3.2 AND 5.5 MM INCISIONS, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 24(4), 1998, pp. 509-514
Purpose: To compare the long-term clinical results of two small incisi
on cataract surgery procedures. Setting: Seven centers in Japan. Metho
ds: Two hundred eyes were randomly assigned to receive a silicone intr
aocular lens (IOL) through a 3.2 mm incision or a poly(methyl methacry
late) (PMMA) IOL through a 5.5 mm incision. Except for incision size a
nd implantation technique, the surgical methods were identical. Uncorr
ected and corrected visual acuity, keratometry, flare-cell intensity,
specular microscopy, and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsul
otomy rate were analyzed up to 3 years after surgery. Results: Eyes in
the 3.2 mm incision group had significantly better uncorrected and co
rrected visual acuity in the early postoperative period and lower aque
ous flare intensity immediately after surgery, but these differences d
isappeared after the first postoperative month. However, surgically in
duced astigmatism was significantly less in the 3.2 mm incision group
than in the 5.5 incision group throughout the study. The Nd:YAG laser
capsulotomy rate was higher in the silicone IOL group (23.5% at 3 year
s postoperatively) than in the PMMA IOL group (18.4%), but the differe
nce was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Smaller incision ca
taract surgery led to earlier recovery of visual function in the short
term and less induced astigmatism in the long term.