Iw. Klimberg et al., A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LEVOFLOXACIN AND LOMEFLOXACIN IN THE TREATMENT OF COMPLICATED URINARY-TRACT INFECTION, Urology, 51(4), 1998, pp. 610-615
Objectives. The efficacy and safety of levofloxacin and lomefloxacin i
n complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) were compared in a rando
mized, open-label, multicenter study. Methods. Outpatients were random
ized to receive levofloxacin (250 mg once daily) for 7 to 10 days or l
omefloxacin (400 mg once daily) for 14 days. Three hundred thirty-six
patients (171 with levofloxacin, 165 with lomefloxacin) were evaluable
for microbiologic efficacy, and 461 patients (232 with levofloxacin,
229 with lomefloxacin) for safety. Results. The overall microbiologic
eradication rate of pathogens was 95.5% (168 of 176) for levofloxacin
and 91.7% (154 of 168) for lomefloxacin. Eradication rates with respec
t to patients were 95.5% (163 of 171) and 92.1% (152 of 165) for levof
loxacin and lomefloxacin, respectively. At the 5 to 9-day post-therapy
visit, symptoms were completely resolved in 84.8% of levofloxacin-tre
ated patients and were decreased in 8.2% (93.0% clinical success). Amo
ng the lomefloxacin-treated patients, complete resolution was seen in
82.4%, with decreased symptoms in 6.1% (88.5% clinical success). Drug-
related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 10 (2.6%) and 18 (5.2%)
levofloxacin- and lomefloxacin-treated patients, respectively. Compare
d with levofloxacin-treated patients, more lomefloxacin-treated patien
ts experienced photosensitivity reactions (3 [1.3%] versus 0) and dizz
iness (2 [0.9%] versus 0). Nausea (3 [1.3%] versus 1 [0.4%]) was more
frequent in the levofloxacin-treated group. Six patients in each treat
ment group had a gastrointestinal AE (1.7%); rash was reported more fr
equently with lomefloxacin (4 patients [0.4%]) than with levofloxacin
(1 patient [0.4%]). Discontinuation because of AEs was observed in 8 (
3.4%) levofloxacin- and 14 (6.1%) lomefloxacin-treated patients. Concl
usions. Once-daily levofloxacin is as effective as and has a superior
tolerability profile than lomefloxacin in the treatment of complicated
UTIs. (C) 1998, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.