BIOEFFICACY OF SYNTHETIC AND BOTANICAL INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROLLING PODBORER (HELICOVERPA-ARMIGERA) AND PODFLY (MELANAGROMYZA-OBTUSA) INFESTING VEGETABLE-PURPOSE PIGEONPEA (CAJANUS-CAJAN)

Citation
Jj. Patel et al., BIOEFFICACY OF SYNTHETIC AND BOTANICAL INSECTICIDES FOR CONTROLLING PODBORER (HELICOVERPA-ARMIGERA) AND PODFLY (MELANAGROMYZA-OBTUSA) INFESTING VEGETABLE-PURPOSE PIGEONPEA (CAJANUS-CAJAN), Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 67(3), 1997, pp. 117-119
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
ISSN journal
00195022
Volume
67
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
117 - 119
Database
ISI
SICI code
0019-5022(1997)67:3<117:BOSABI>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rainy season (kharif) 1993 and 1994 to find out an effective and economical insecticide for controll ing podborer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner), plume moth (Marasmarcha li ophanes Mey) and podfly (Melanogromyza obtusa Malloch) on vegetable - purpose pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Endosulfan EC 0.035% ( 1 : 14.18) gave the highest incremental cost : benefit ratio, followed by endosulfan wp 0.035% (1 : 12.95) and chlorpyriphos 0.02%. Neem - s eed - kernel suspension (NSKS) 3%, though gave 1 : 11.77 cost : benefi t ratio, was less effective and economical for controlling these insec ts.