H. Kieler et al., ROUTINE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY AND THE CHILDRENS SUBSEQUENT NEUROLOGIC DEVELOPMENT, Obstetrics and gynecology, 91(5), 1998, pp. 750-756
Objective: To test the null hypothesis of no association between ultra
sound exposure in early fetal life and impaired neurologic development
in childhood. Methods: Study of children age 8-9 years whose mothers
participated in a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening
during pregnancy in Sweden during 1985-1987. Of 4637 eligible singleto
ns, 3265 (70%) were studied through a questionnaire to their mothers.
Assessment of neurologic development was based on parents' report of t
heir child's speech and motor development. Behavioral disorders were a
ssessed by a ten-item parent scale. Analyses were performed according
to both assignment and ultrasound exposure. With a sample size of 1600
children in each group, a two-sided alpha of .05 and beta of .10, a r
isk ratio of less than 1.4 for the studied variables could not be dete
cted. Results: Delayed speech development was reported by 2.9% in the
screening group compared with 2.4% in the nonscreening group (odds rat
io [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79, 1.88). Similar preval
ences were found when analysis was according to ultrasound exposure (O
R 1.19, 95% CI 0.78, 1.83). Delayed motor development was reported by
7.6% in the screening group compared with 7.2% in the nonscreening gro
up (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.81, 1.37). Corresponding figures for ultrasound-
exposed and -unexposed were 7.7% and 7.2%, respectively (OR 1.08; 95%
CI 0.83, 1.40). There also were no significant differences in behavior
al disorders between screened and unscreened children or between expos
ed and unexposed children, respectively, according to parents' ratings
. Conclusion: No significant difference in impaired neurologic develop
ment between ultrasound-exposed and -unexposed children was found in t
his study. (C) 1998 by The American College of Obstericians and Gyneco
logists.