ROUTINE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY AND THE CHILDRENS SUBSEQUENT NEUROLOGIC DEVELOPMENT

Citation
H. Kieler et al., ROUTINE ULTRASOUND SCREENING IN PREGNANCY AND THE CHILDRENS SUBSEQUENT NEUROLOGIC DEVELOPMENT, Obstetrics and gynecology, 91(5), 1998, pp. 750-756
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00297844
Volume
91
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Part
1
Pages
750 - 756
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-7844(1998)91:5<750:RUSIPA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Objective: To test the null hypothesis of no association between ultra sound exposure in early fetal life and impaired neurologic development in childhood. Methods: Study of children age 8-9 years whose mothers participated in a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening during pregnancy in Sweden during 1985-1987. Of 4637 eligible singleto ns, 3265 (70%) were studied through a questionnaire to their mothers. Assessment of neurologic development was based on parents' report of t heir child's speech and motor development. Behavioral disorders were a ssessed by a ten-item parent scale. Analyses were performed according to both assignment and ultrasound exposure. With a sample size of 1600 children in each group, a two-sided alpha of .05 and beta of .10, a r isk ratio of less than 1.4 for the studied variables could not be dete cted. Results: Delayed speech development was reported by 2.9% in the screening group compared with 2.4% in the nonscreening group (odds rat io [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79, 1.88). Similar preval ences were found when analysis was according to ultrasound exposure (O R 1.19, 95% CI 0.78, 1.83). Delayed motor development was reported by 7.6% in the screening group compared with 7.2% in the nonscreening gro up (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.81, 1.37). Corresponding figures for ultrasound- exposed and -unexposed were 7.7% and 7.2%, respectively (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.83, 1.40). There also were no significant differences in behavior al disorders between screened and unscreened children or between expos ed and unexposed children, respectively, according to parents' ratings . Conclusion: No significant difference in impaired neurologic develop ment between ultrasound-exposed and -unexposed children was found in t his study. (C) 1998 by The American College of Obstericians and Gyneco logists.