P. Schandelmaier et al., PREBENDING AND PRETENSIONING OF THE SMALL 4.5 MM AO TITANIUM LC-DCP, Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 382(6), 1997, pp. 325-331
To assess the behavior of the LC-DCP with prebending and pretensioning
we tested: gap angle vs. tensioning force without prebending; Bending
moment for different prebending angles; In a model using a fiber tube
to simulate the bone for different prebending angles and pretensionin
g forces of the LC-DCP the deformation in 4 point bending open was tes
ted. Maximum prebending angle was 24 degrees, maximum pretensioning fo
rce was 2400 N; in human cadaver tibiae angles of 3 degrees, 9 degrees
, 24 degrees and forces of 300 N, 1000 N and 1500 N, were tested to lo
ok for the difference in a less idealized model. - Results: 1. A near
linear curve for gap angle vs, force with an angle of 0.45 degrees/100
N was found between 100 N and 1500 N; 2. We did not find a near linea
r bending moment/bending angle curve up to 8 degrees like in the DCP b
ut an exponential curve development as it had to be expected by the lo
wer modulus of elasticity of titanium; 3. the maximum mechanical stabi
lity was found for a angle of 24 degrees and a force of 1500 N. - The
titanium LC-DCP shows a different mechanical reaction to prebending an
d pretensioning in the bone implant complex compared to stul DCP. Opti
mum prebending and pretensioning for axial compression and mechanical
stability in the LC-DCP are by far greater than clinically possible. F
rom our mechanical testing a prebending angle of 24 degrees and a pret
ensioning force of 1500 N would allow the largest axial compression an
d show the most resistance against deformation in bending open. In the
clinical setting this would result in difficult reduction and therefo
re, we recommend a prebending angle of 9 degrees and a pretensioning f
orce of 1000 N.