Sm. Muhldorfer et al., LONG-TERM RESULTS OF CONTINENCE FUNCTION IN PATIENTS AFTER ILEOANAL RECONSTRUCTION, Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 382(6), 1997, pp. 337-342
An important aim of proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
(IPAA) is to maintain anal continence. Anal sphincter disruption durin
g IPAA is felt to play an important role in loss of continence, which
is described in up to 30% of the treated patients in the early postope
rative period. Although sphincter function recovers gradually after su
rgery, some patients stay incontinent. In our investigation of possibl
e parameters involved in preservation of continence after this operati
ve procedure, we focused on changes in anal manometry. We compared the
se findings with the functional results obtained by questioning the pa
tients and physical examination. Anal manometry was performed with a l
ow-compliance hydraulic perfusion system. All patients underwent a J-p
ouch procedure with a short rectal cuff for ileoanal reconstruction. W
e examined 25 patients, 13 underwent operation for the treatment of ul
cerative colitis, 12 because of adenomatous polyposis. In the colitis
and polyposis group, 28% of the patients reported events of soiling. T
hree patients (12%) were incontinent. The remaining 15 patients were c
ompletely continent. The median time after operation was 58 months, ra
nging from 12 to 96 months. Comparing the results of anal manometry wi
th standard values of ten age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers,
it was found that there was a significant increase in the threshold of
balloon awareness and urge to defecate. These sensations were sometim
es elicited by pouch contractions. Median pouch-compliance was also cl
early elevated in comparison to rectal compliance (P<0.005). Inhibitor
y reflexes during balloon inflation could not be evoked in any of the
patients. Comparing continent with incontinent patients there were sig
nificant differences in balloon awareness, urge to defecate, and stool
frequency (P<0.01, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively). But in contrast
to other publications, we could not find significant differences in a
nal sphincter length, resting and squeezing, anal canal pressure. Pouc
h compliance was lowered in incontinent patients and negatively correl
ated with stool frequency (P<0.001, r=-0.82). In conclusion, our study
indicates that anal sphincter resting pressure alone is not a crucial
factor in continence preservation in the long-term after total procto
colectomy and IPAA. Poor pouch-compliance and concomitant higher stool
frequencies seem to be related to incontinence in this patient group.