IS BABY TOO WARM - THE USE OF INFANT CLOTHING, BEDDING AND HOME HEATING IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

Citation
L. Watson et al., IS BABY TOO WARM - THE USE OF INFANT CLOTHING, BEDDING AND HOME HEATING IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA, Early human development, 51(2), 1998, pp. 93-107
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology",Pediatrics
Journal title
ISSN journal
03783782
Volume
51
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
93 - 107
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-3782(1998)51:2<93:IBTW-T>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Overheating of infants has been associated with a raised risk for sudd en infant death syndrome (SIDS). Data on the use of heating, bedding a nd clothing and other measures affecting the thermal environment of 4 week old infants were collected at a home interview for infants of wom en born in Australia (Anglo-Celtic background), in Southern Europe, in Asia and of women who had a planned out-of-hospital birth. These grou ps have different risks of SIDS not explained by the classic social an d perinatal risk factors nor associated with the currently promoted 'n ew' risk factors. Thermal insulation of the infant's bedding and cloth ing and excess thermal insulation (for any observed room temperature) were calculated. Bed sharing differed significantly between the groups as did the use of a sheepskin, tucking in firmly, the closing of door s and window's and the use of heating in the infant's room. After stra tifying by bed sharing practice and season of interview, it was found that bed sharing infants had more thermal insulation than those sleepi ng alone irrespective of season of interview. Infants sleeping alone i n the Asian-born and Southern European-born groups were kept warmer th an infants in the other two groups. Cultural factors appear to affect the thermal environment in which infants are raised. Some bed sharing infants in all four groups were inappropriately warm, particularly in colder weather, but this was more likely in the Asian-born (low risk) group than in the home birth (high risk) group. These results do not e xplain the differences in SIDS incidence between the groups. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inland Ltd.