A. Belhajsaif et al., DISTRIBUTION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTSTIMULUS EFFECTS IN PROXIMAL AND DISTAL FORELIMB MUSCLES FROM RED NUCLEUS IN THE MONKEY, Journal of neurophysiology, 79(4), 1998, pp. 1777-1789
We used stimulus-triggered averaging (StTA) of electromyographic (EMG)
activity to investigate two major questions concerning the functional
organization of the magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) for reaching move
ments in the macaque monkey. The first is whether the clear preference
toward facilitation of extensor muscles we have reported in previous
studies for distal (wrist and digit) forelimb muscles also exists for
proximal muscles (shoulder and elbow). The second question is whether
distal and proximal muscles may be cofacilitated from RNm suggesting t
he representation of functional muscle synergies for coordinated reach
ing movements. Two monkeys were trained to perform a prehension task r
equiring multijoint coordination of the forelimb. EMG activity was rec
orded from 24 forelimb muscles including 5 shoulder, 7 elbow, 5 wrist,
5 digit, and 2 intrinsic hand muscles. Microstimulation (20 mu A at 2
0 Hz) was delivered throughout the movement task. From 137 microstimul
ation sites in the RNm, a total of 977 poststimulus effects was obtain
ed including 733 poststimulus facilitation effects (PStF) and 244 post
stimulus suppression effects (PStS). Of the PStF effects, 58% were obt
ained from distal muscles; 42% from proximal muscles. Digit muscles we
re more frequently facilitated (35%) than the wrist, elbow, or shoulde
r muscles (20, 24, and 18%, respectively). The intrinsic hand muscles
were infrequently facilitated (3%). At all joints tested, PStF was mor
e common in extensor muscles than flexor muscles. This extensor prefer
ence was-very strong for shoulder (85%), wrist (85%), and digit muscle
s (94%) and weaker for elbow muscles (60%). Of the PStS effects, 65% w
ere in distal muscles and 35% in proximal muscles, interestingly, the
flexor muscles were more frequently inhibited from RNm than extensor m
uscles. At 72% of stimulation sites, at least two muscles were facilit
ated. The majority of these sites (61%) cofacilitated both proximal an
d distal muscles. At the remaining sites (39%), PStF was observed in e
ither the proximal (17%) or distal muscles (22%). Facilitation most of
ten involved combinations of shoulder, elbow, and distal muscles (30%)
or shoulder and distal muscles (26%). Only rarely were intrinsic hand
muscles part of the total muscle synergy. Our results show that the R
Nm 1) controls both proximal and distal muscles but the strength of in
fluence is biased toward distal muscles, 2) preferentially controls ex
tensor muscles not only at distal forelimb joints but also at proximal
joints, and 3) output zones cofacilitate synergies of proximal and di
stal muscles involved in the control of forelimb reaching movements.