COMPARISON OF PROTECTION AFFORDED BY SINGLE MEASLES VACCINATION AND LATE REVACCINATION SCHEDULES

Citation
T. Marufu et al., COMPARISON OF PROTECTION AFFORDED BY SINGLE MEASLES VACCINATION AND LATE REVACCINATION SCHEDULES, East African medical journal, 74(12), 1997, pp. 777-779
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
0012835X
Volume
74
Issue
12
Year of publication
1997
Pages
777 - 779
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-835X(1997)74:12<777:COPABS>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
An intervention study compared the protection afforded vaccinees by si ngle measles vaccination and late revaccination schedules in 1990-94, During the intervention a single revaccination (after initial vaccinat ion at nine months of age) was applied to children at any point in tim e between 12 and 23 months of age. Cases of measles aged 10-23 months were identified through an active surveillance system and in this peri od 5, 11 and 11 cases of revaccinated, single vaccination and unvaccin ated children were identified. Measles incidence rates were 392.2-415. 6 (mean=405.6, SD=6.7), 75.4-112.1 (median=91.7, SD=13.3) and 12.8-15. 2 (mean=13.9, SD=0.99) per 100 000 population in children who were unv accinated, with single vaccination and revaccinated respectively. Rela tive risk of contracting measles in children who were unvaccinated or with single vaccination was 26.5-32.5 (mean=29.4, SD=2.3) and 5.8-8.8 (mean=6.8, SD=1.2) respectively compared with revaccinated children, V accine efficacies that were determined were 73-81% (mean=77.2, SD=2.9) and 96.2-96.9% (mean=96.6, SD=0.27) for single vaccination and late r evaccination schedules respectively. It was concluded that late revacc ination affords vaccinees better protection than single vaccination th rough improvement in vaccine.