In this article I address the remarks made in Fodor and Lepore's artic
le, ''The Emptiness of the Lexicon: Reflections on James Pustejovsky's
The Generative Lexicon,'' regarding the research program outlined in
Pustejovsky 1995. My response focuses on two themes, FL's misreadings
and misinterpretations of the substance as well as the details of the
theory, and the generally negative and unconstructive view of the stud
y of semantics and natural language meaning inherent in their approach
.