Seventh-grade student maps in two ways. Some made maps individually an
d others constructed maps collaboratively in small groups. Post-test r
esults on a written geography test indicated that students who worked
in small groups had a slightly better understanding of map concepts th
an those who worked individually. Within the collaborative setting it
was found that the groups who gained more on the geography test spent
more time talking about core map concepts and more time planning and e
valuating their work than the groups who gained less. Further, the hig
h gaining groups engaged in discourse that made better use of planning
and cooperation than did the low groups. We discuss why making maps i
n groups can enhance students' conceptual geographic understanding and
offer suggestions about what might be done to improve geography instr
uction using small-group configurations.