The assessment of new treatment strategies such as the atypical antips
ychotic agents goes far beyond the assessment of psychopathology, and
includes evaluation of their effects on a variety of needs associated
with living in the community. This article provides some empirical dat
a for such a multidimensional perspective in analysing drug treatment
with conventional antipsychotics. We focus on two groups of schizophre
nic patients discharged from a psychiatric hospital, who were followed
up for one year. One group was treated with oral and the other with d
epot medication. The two groups were assessed on their needs for care,
quality of life, and rehospitalisation rates. We found few significan
t differences between depot-and orally-medicated patients. However, pa
tients treated with depot antipsychotics were receiving higher mean da
ily doses. Patients taking oral medication had a lower rate of adverse
effects but were more non-compliant, which resulted in a higher rehos
pitalisation rate, confirming our assumption that patients take differ
ent risk-to-benefit decisions. Orally-medicated patients did not have
a better functional status than depot-medicated patients.