The project described in this article takes the first step toward defi
ning the construct of quality children's television by empirically ana
lyzing how the industry defines quality. Our goal was to explore the c
haracteristics of the best of children's programming to determine the
characteristics of a quality product. Our data were drawn from the arc
hives of the George Foster Peabody Awards to study all the award-winni
ng programs in the children's category in order to answer the followin
g research questions: (1) what are the characteristics of a quality pr
ogram; and (2) what claims does the industry make about a quality prog
ram? There are a number of characteristics of winning shows. The prepo
nderance of awards went to programs that were educational or dramatic.
Nearly one-third of awards were given to specials; local shows garner
ed a hefty 11 percent of awards. In many ways, award-winning programs
were divergent from the norm in children's programming. Beyond the obs
ervable characteristics of shows were the qualities claimed for them i
n the nomination process. Our 67 winning shows generated 332 separate
claims, which can be categorized broadly into claims about excellence
in production, superiority, instruction, influence, age appropriatenes
s, and prestigious participants.