Tp. Markovic et al., THE DETERMINANTS OF GLYCEMIC RESPONSES TO DIET RESTRICTION AND WEIGHT-LOSS IN OBESITY AND NIDDM, Diabetes care, 21(5), 1998, pp. 687-694
OBJECTIVE - To examine the mechanisms by which weight loss improves gl
ycemic control in overweight subjects with NIDDM, particularly the rel
ationships between energy restriction, improvement in insulin sensitiv
ity, and regional and overall adipose tissue loss. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS - Hyperinsulinemic glucose clamps were performed in 20 subjec
ts (BMI = 32.0 +/- 0.5 [SEM] kg/m(2), age = 48.4 +/- 2.7 years) with n
ormal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 10) or mild NIDDM (n = 10) before a
nd on the 4th (d4) and 28th (d28) days of a reduced-energy (1,100 +/-
250 [SD] kcal/day) formula diet. Body composition changes were assesse
d by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and insulin secretory changes we
re measured by insulin response to intravenous glucose before and afte
r weight loss. RESULTS - In both groups, energy restriction (d4) reduc
ed fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (Delta FPG: NGT = -0.4 +/- 0.2 mmol/l
and NIDDM = -1.1 +/- 0.03 mmol/l, P = 0.002), which was independently
related to reduced carbohydrate intake (partial r = 0.64, P = 0.003).
There was a marked d4 increase in percent of insulin suppression of he
patic glucose output (HGO) in both groups (Delta HGO suppression: NGT
= 28 +/- 15% and NIDDM = 32 +/- 8%, P = 0.002). By d28, with 6.3 +/- 0
.4 kg weight loss, FPG was further reduced (d4 vs, d28) in NIDDM only
(P = 0.05), and insulin sensitivity increased in both groups (P = 0.02
). Only loss of abdominal fat related to improvements in FPG (r = 0.51
, P = 0.03) and insulin sensitivity after weight loss (r = 0.48, P = 0
.05). In contrast to insulin action, there were only small changes in
insulin secretion. CONCLUSIONS - Both energy restriction and weight lo
ss have beneficial effects on insulin action and glycemic control in o
besity and mild NIDDM. The effect of energy restriction is related to
changes in individual macronutrients, whereas weight loss effects rela
te to changes in abdominal fat.