A. Otto et al., AKINETIC MUTISM AS A CLASSIFICATION CRITERION FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB-DISEASE, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 64(4), 1998, pp. 524-528
Objectives-Among the classification criteria for the diagnosis of Creu
tzfeldt-Jakob disease, akinetic mutism is described as a symptom which
helps to establish the diagnosis as possible or probable. Akinetic mu
tism has been anatomically divided into two forms-the mesencephalic fo
rm and the frontal form. The aim of this study was to delimit the symp
tom of akinetic mutism in patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from
the complex of symptoms of an apallic syndrome and to assign it to th
e individual forms. Methods-Between April and December 1996, 25 akinet
ic and mute patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease were consecutively
examined. The patients were classified according to the definition of
akinetic mutism by Cairns and secondly in accordance with the feature
s constituting the complete picture of an appalic syndrome (defined by
Gerstenbrand). Results-From 25 patients with definite Creutzfeldt-Jak
ob disease, 24 patients showed impoverishment of speech and, after a m
ean duration of four (range 1.1-11.2) months, almost complete absence
of voluntary movements and speech. Seven patients were classified as b
eing mute and akinetic and assigned to the mesencephalic form whereas
13 patients were classified as apallic. One patient was mute without b
eing akinetic and four patients were comatose. Conclusion-Diffuse brai
n damage underlies akinetic mutism in patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease. The term can be used as a classification criterion for the di
agnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; however, it should be applied ve
ry carefully and delimited clearly from the apallic syndrome.