Vrn. Panday et al., CARBOPLATIN DOSAGE FORMULAS CAN GENERATE INACCURATE PREDICTIONS OF CARBOPLATIN EXPOSURE IN CARBOPLATIN PACLITAXEL COMBINATION REGIMENS/, Clinical drug investigation, 15(4), 1998, pp. 327-335
Carboplatin is a frequently used antitumour agent recommended to be ad
ministered according to the Calvert formula: dose = AUC x (GFR+25), wh
ere GFR is the glomerular filtration rate as measured by Cr-51-EDTA cl
earance and AUC is the targeted area under the carboplatin concentrati
on versus time curve. In several modified Calvert formulae, the GFR is
estimated on the basis of serum creatinine levels. We compared AUCs o
f carboplatin that were predicted by modified Calvert formulae with ac
tual measured AUCs in 75 courses in patients with non-small cell lung
cancer or ovarian cancer who were treated with the combination of carb
oplatin-paclitaxel. Predictions were made using two modified Calvert f
ormulae, in which the GFR was calculated by serum creatinine level-bas
ed equations, according to Jelliffe (Eq. 1) and Cockroft-Gault (Eq. 2)
. We also studied the performance of a formula for the clearance of ca
rboplatin, as proposed by Chatelut (Eq. 3). The actual measured mean A
UC was 4.6 mg/ml.min (range 1.9 to 10.4 mg/ml min, SD 1.7). Equation 1
overestimated the AUC by 32.9% with an imprecision of 43.0%, and equa
tion 2 overestimated the AUC by 27.6% with an imprecision of 33.4%. Fo
r equation 3, an AUC overestimation of only 10.2%, but with an impreci
sion of 25.3%, was observed. In conclusion, all three equations overes
timated the carboplatin AUCs and had poor precisions. We concluded tha
t the real carboplatin AUCs were lower than calculated, using the thre
e tested formulae. This may have important consequences for ongoing an
d future phase II and III studies with carboplatin-paclitaxel combinat
ions, utilising these formulae to calculate the carboplatin dose. Thus
far, the original Calvert dosage formula remains the 'golden standard
'.