O. Stepien et al., AMLODIPINE INHIBITION OF SERUM-INDUCED, THROMBIN-INDUCED, OR FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR-INDUCED VASCULAR SMOOTH-MUSCLE CELL-PROLIFERATION, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 31(5), 1998, pp. 786-793
Atherosclerosis, like several other vascular diseases, exhibits struct
ural and functional abnormalities resulting partially from an exaggera
ted proliferation of vascular smooth-muscle cells (VSMCs). Ca2+ channe
l blockers, such as amlodipine, have been suggested to retard or even
prevent the progression of atherosclerosis,To determine the mechanisms
involved in these effects, we investigated the influence of amlodipin
e on VSMC proliferation by using rat aortic VSMCs in culture. Amlodipi
ne (0.1-10 mu M) inhibited serum-, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFG
F)-, and thrombin-induced VSMC proliferation and DNA synthesis in a co
ncentration-dependent manner, as demonstrated by cell count and bromod
eoxyuridine (BrdU)-incorporation measurements, respectively. Delayed a
ddition of amlodipine after VSMC stimulation showed that the drug exer
ted its effect early in Gi phase of the cell cycle. This observation w
as confirmed by the finding that amlodipine did not influence DNA synt
hesis in VSMCs arrested to the G(1)/S boundary by hydroxyurea treatmen
t. Consistent with its effects on VSMC growth/proliferation, amlodipin
e also decreased c-myc, c-fos, and c-jun protooncogene expression indu
ced by serum, thrombin, or bFGF within 1 h after cell activation, as a
ssessed by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chai
n reaction (PCR) analysis. The calcium channel agonist Bay K 8644, whi
ch counteracted the inhibition by nifedipine of bFGF-, thrombin- or se
rum-induced DNA synthesis, was ineffective to antagonize the inhibitor
y effect of amlodipine. The aforementioned effects of amlodipine were
of similar amplitude, irrespective of the growth-enhancing agent used.
This strongly indicates that amlodipine acts downstream of receptor a
ctivation to exert its antiproliferative action, probably early in the
G(1) phase of the cell cycle. Moreover, the lack of antagonistic effe
ct between amlodipine and Bay K 8644 suggests that, in addition to its
L-type Calc channel inhibitory effect, amlodipine inhibits other intr
acellular signaling pathways. Such an interference of amlodipine with
mitogenic signaling pathways might contribute to confer a blood vessel
-protecting potential on amlodipine.