G. Tsaparlis et al., MOLECULAR-EQUILIBRIUM PROBLEMS - MANIPULATION OF LOGICAL STRUCTURE AND OF M-DEMAND, AND THEIR EFFECT ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE, Science education, 82(4), 1998, pp. 437-454
Molecular-equilibrium (chemical-equilibrium) problems are among the mo
st important, and at the same time most complex and difficult general
chemistry problems. In this work, we examine the effect on student per
formance of the manipulation of the logical structure as well as of th
e M-demand of these problems. In addition, we study the relationship b
etween student performance on the problems and a number of cognitive v
ariables, viz., developmental level, working memory capacity, function
al M-capacity and disembedding ability of students. In addition, we te
st the validity of the Johnstone-El-Banna model. Nine problems of vary
ing number of operative schemata, as well as of varying number of M-de
mand, were used. The number of schemata varied froth a-minimum of two,
to a maximum of four, while within each logical schema we had specifi
c mental demand (M-demand), varying from four to six. As basic molecul
ar-equilibrium schemata in these problems, we considered the following
: (1) the process of establishment of chemical equilibrium; (2) the co
ndition of chemical equilibrium; (3) the case of gaseous systems, with
use of partial and total pressures as well as of K-p; and (4) the dis
turbance of equilibrium and the establishment of a new equilibrium. Th
e correlation between student performance in the schemata and the step
s of the problem solutions is low when the number of schemata is low,
but high when this number is high. Of the cognitive factors studied, d
evelopmental level plays the most important role, especially as the lo
gical structure of the problem increases. The other three cognitive va
riables also have an effect, with working memory capacity leading. The
findings are mainly attributed to the fact that the problems were rat
her algorithmic exercises for the students, because of familiarity and
training. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.