Young workers in the 1990s can expect greater economic insecurity, as
well as lower average earnings, compared to older workers, or compared
to, the youth of previous decades. The cost of greater insecurity dep
ends upon an individual's probability of unemployment, marginal utilit
y of income gains/losses and the extent to which individuals can smoot
h consumption over time by borrowing and drawing down assets. Since un
employment insurance cutbacks and higher unemployment have increased t
he risk exposure of youth, changes in the expected value of their inco
me may understate utility losses as measured by the change in certaint
y equivalent income. This paper uses a behavioural microsimulation mod
el to compare the impacts of 1971 and 1994 unemployment insurance legi
slation and unemployment rates in Canada. It calculates both the expec
ted value of income changes and, using a Stone-Geary utility function,
the change in inequality of well-being las measured by certainty equi
valent income) for youth and for prime age workers. Both calculations
reveal that youth were disproportionately affected by Canada's changin
g labour market environment. Very few youth have enough assets to fina
nce consumption during spells of unemployment.