With nearly five thousand children's books published each year, librar
ians have become dependent on reviews to guide them in the purchasing
of juvenile titles. The purpose of this study is to determine the adeq
uacy of reviews of children's books in the six most utilized reviewing
journals. Two coding sheets are used to gather and analyze the data i
n relation to the extent of the coverage and content of 599 reviews of
Notable Children's Books lists during 1994-96. The findings are compa
red with earlier studies, with some noteworthy changes including incre
ases in both evaluative comments and the attention paid to illustratio
ns. School Library Journal is found to provide the most complete bibli
ographic and ordering information. However, great variation in the ade
quacy of the content of the reviews continues to exist. As in earlier
studies, this research indicates that no single journal provides all t
he information that librarians need.