SAMPLE PREPARATION AFFECTS SEPARATION OF WHEY PROTEINS BY REVERSED-PHASE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY

Citation
G. Bobe et al., SAMPLE PREPARATION AFFECTS SEPARATION OF WHEY PROTEINS BY REVERSED-PHASE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 46(4), 1998, pp. 1321-1325
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science & Tenology",Agriculture,"Chemistry Applied
ISSN journal
00218561
Volume
46
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1321 - 1325
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8561(1998)46:4<1321:SPASOW>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Measured concentrations of whey proteins in single milk samples often differ by more than 20% when analyzed by different separation methods. In the current study, we examined the effects of using guanidine hydr ochloride or urea at zero and 8.5 h after sample preparation and the e ffects of using dithiothreitol or a-mercaptoethanol on the separation of bovine milk proteins by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chro matography. Treatment with guanidine hydrochloride or urea resulted in similar separation of milk proteins when samples were injected immedi ately after preparation. Separation was repeatable over 8.5 h for samp les prepared with guanidine hydrochloride, whereas the resolution of a -lactalbumin and beta-lactoglobulin decreased for samples treated with urea. Treatment with dithiothreitol improved the resolution of alpha- lactalbumin and beta-lactoglobulin in comparison with treatment with 2 -mercaptoethanol. Quantitation of whey proteins is more reliable when milk samples are treated with dithiothreitol and guanidine hydrochlori de than when treated with 2-mercaptoethanol or urea.