NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL, NEUROLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME FOLLOWING PALLIDOTOMY FOR PARKINSONS-DISEASE - A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 8 SIMULTANEOUS BILATERAL AND 12 UNILATERAL PROCEDURES
R. Scott et al., NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL, NEUROLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME FOLLOWING PALLIDOTOMY FOR PARKINSONS-DISEASE - A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 8 SIMULTANEOUS BILATERAL AND 12 UNILATERAL PROCEDURES, Brain, 121, 1998, pp. 659-675
Intellectual, psychological and functional outcomes were evaluated in
a consecutive series of 20 Parkinsonian patients who had unilateral (U
PVP) or simultaneous bilateral posteroventral pallidotomy (BPVP) using
Image Fusion(TM) and Stereoplan(TM) (Radionics Inc., Boston, Mass., U
SA) with stimulation for lesion localization. Comprehensive baseline a
nd 3-month postoperative neuropsychological and neurological assessmen
t protocols were administered together with questionnaire measures of
functional disability, quality of life and psychological symptomatolog
y. Changes in patients' clinical presentation and scores on psychometr
ic tests, questionnaires and observational rating scales were then exa
mined. We observed no new neuropsychiatric sequelae directly related t
o pallidotomy. Cognitive sequelae were restricted to selective reducti
ons in categorical verbal fluency following UPVP (P < 0.001) and BPVP
(P < 0.01) and a reduction in phonemic verbal fluency following BPVP (
P < 0.01); these changes were not reported subjectively. A fall in dia
dochokinetic rates (P < 0.01) and some subjective reports of a worseni
ng in pre-existing dysarthria, hypophonia mid hypersalivation/drooling
following BPVP also suggested changes in speech motor apparatus; howe
ver these changes did not have significant functional consequences. Th
ere was one case of more generalized cognitive impairment following BP
VP. We also observed significant symptomatic improvement on neurologic
al rating scales; following UPVP, Total Unified Parkinson's Disease Ra
ting Scale (UPDRS) scores improved by 27% (P < 0.01) and following BPV
P the improvement was 53% (P < 0.05). Patients' perceptions of reduced
postoperative functional disability and improvements in 'quality of l
ife' also achieved statistical significance on a number of both physic
al and psychosocial questionnaire subscales.