TRENDS IN ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS AT THE SUMMIT OF THE WANK MOUNTAIN, SOUTHERN GERMANY

Authors
Citation
F. Slemr et He. Scheel, TRENDS IN ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS AT THE SUMMIT OF THE WANK MOUNTAIN, SOUTHERN GERMANY, Atmospheric environment, 32(5), 1998, pp. 845-853
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
13522310
Volume
32
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
845 - 853
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-2310(1998)32:5<845:TIAMCA>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Total gaseous mercury (TGM) has been monitored at the summit of the Wa nk mountain (1780 m a.s.l.) in the Bavarian Alps since March 1990. A s tatistical analysis of the data set until May 1996 consisting of 1670 individual TGM measurements shows a linear decrease of 0.169 +/- 0.009 ng Hg m(-3) yr(-1), i.e. about 7% per year. The seasonal variation sh ows maximum TGM concentrations in March and minima in October-December . The frequency of occurrence of extremely high TGM concentrations and the amplitude of the seasonal variation decreased over the observatio n time. The observed decrease of the TGM concentration is in agreement with measurements in Scandinavia, indicating that the measurements at Wank are representative for the region of central and northern Europe . The decrease in TGM concentration of 23.3% between 1990 and 1994 was consistent with decreases of 20.4 and 21.2%, respectively, observed b y us over the northern and the southern Atlantic Ocean. This and the o bservation of a decreasing trend in mercury wet deposition in the U.S. A. indicate the global significance of the TGM trends observed in Euro pe. Several causes may add up, but this 45% change in TGM concentratio ns observed over the period of 6 years cannot be plausibly explained w ithout a substantial decrease of anthropogenic mercury emissions on bo th regional and global scales. Such decrease, however, is difficult to reconcile with most of the current anthropogenic emission inventories . This points to possible gaps in our understanding of the anthropogen ic emission processes. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reser ved.