For teaching young men to assume their dominant position in social rel
ations between the sexes, the military institution depends on various
material props, particularly weapons. During target practice and in th
e care of weapons, officers employ an openly sexist language comparing
the possession of a weapon to the possession of a woman. At the same
time, in practicing the use of weapons, which is often compared to sex
ual activity, the rifle symbolically replaces the phallus as an attrib
ute of masculinity. Not easy to accept intellectually, this ambivalent
representation of weapons induces, in boys doing their military servi
ce as they build their masculinity, the fear of going insane and/or be
ing thrust into femininity.