Ecosystems, despite their diversity, respond to stress in similar ways
. The major pressures which cause the transformation of systems from h
ealthy states to pathological states are classified into four groups:
physical restructuring, overharvesting, waste residuals;and the introd
uction of non-native species. Signs of Ecosystem Distress Syndrome (ED
S) are briefly examined in three contrasting ecosystems: desert grassl
ands, the: Great Lakes, and the Baltic Sea. The issue is raised as to
the difficulty in discerning between healthy ecosystems, recovering fr
om a natural disturbance, and those ecosystems that have lost their or
iginal resilience due to anthropogenic stress. Knowledge of site histo
ry and a rigourous monitoring program are important in the evaluation
of EDS. An assessment of how ecosystem services are affected is indica
tive of the consequences to the human component of ecosystems. Managem
ent strategies which are employed to mitigate the signs of EDS are usu
ally initiated after resilience is lost or the ecosystem has transform
ed to an alternate, stress-induced, stable stare. It is proposed that
preventive strategies measure signs of EDS that serve as early warning
signals, combined with ''fitness tests'' that measure ecosystem respo
nse to natural perturbations. The fitness test for ecosystems is based
on the premise that unstressed systems are more resilient to natural
disturbances than stressed systems.