J. Bruggemann et al., VISCEROSOMATIC INTERACTIONS IN THE THALAMIC VENTRAL POSTEROLATERAL NUCLEUS (VPL) OF THE SQUIRREL-MONKEY, Brain research, 787(2), 1998, pp. 269-276
In anesthetized squirrel monkeys single cell recordings were performed
using tungsten microelectrodes. The responses of 29 viscerosomatocept
ive and somatoceptive VPL neurons to noxious distension of the urinary
bladder, the lower esophagus and the distal colon and to innocuous an
d noxious somatic stimuli were assessed when these stimuli were presen
ted separately or together. Neuronal responses were defined as additiv
e or interactive depending on the relative changes in responses to ind
ividual somatic or visceral stimuli, and on their responses during con
ditioning (somatic and visceral stimuli applied concurrently). In 13 n
eurons interactions between the somatosensory and visceral inputs coul
d be demonstrated. The dominant interactive effect was inhibition, alt
hough facilitatory effects were seen as well (2 of 13). The magnitude
or direction of the interactions seemed independent of the location of
the somatic and visceral receptive fields. The mean population respon
se of the neurons showing interactions was 4.66 spikes/s to somatic st
imulation, and 0.07 spikes/s to visceral stimulation. During condition
ing the mean interactive effect was -62% of the calculated additive ef
fect. This implies that overall the somatic responses are halved durin
g a coincident visceral stimulus. In a subgroup of the VPL neurons, wh
ich were classified as pure somatic responsive (n = 14) due to their u
nresponsiveness during visceral stimulation alone, a third (n = 5) sti
ll exhibited visceral convergence during conditioning. The latter neur
ons, therefore, receive visceral inputs, which function in a purely in
teractive (modulatory) manner. It is concluded that part of the descri
bed effects is due to competition (cross modality suppression) between
the visceral and somatic inputs. We further conclude that the suppres
sion of somatic information by noxious visceral stimuli may contribute
to a more effective processing of the discriminatory aspects of nocic
eptive visceral information previously demonstrated in VPL. (C) 1998 E
lsevier Science B.V.