Sc. Ganguli et al., THE EVOLVING ROLE OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY BEFORE ANDAFTER CHOLECYSTECTOMY, Canadian journal of gastroenterology, 12(3), 1998, pp. 187-191
Laparoscopy is the preferred approach for cholecystectomy; however the
indications for pre-versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholan
giography (ERC) are still evolving. The records of patients who had ER
C performed one month before (n=119) or after (n=35) laparoscopic or o
pen cholecystectomy from January 1990 to August 1992 (period 1), and 6
6 patients who had preoperative ERC from November 1995 to October 1996
(period 2) are reviewed. ERC indications, findings and outcomes were
reviewed, and trends in the use of preoperative ERC from 1990 to 1996
were sought. Between periods 1 and 2 the yield of preoperative ERC inc
reased from 36% to 58% (P<0.01). The use of preoperative ERC for the i
ndication of abnormal liver enzymes declined (P<0.05), while the yield
increased (25% versus 61%, P<0.01). Both the use of ERC and the yield
remained stable for other indications. ERC was felt to have changed t
he surgical approach in 5% of patients. Primary indications for postop
erative ERC (n=35) included abnormal intraoperative cholangiography (4
3%), liver function test abnormalities (23%) and recurrence of preoper
ative symptoms (14%); stones were found in 60%, 50% and 20% of patient
s with these indications, respectively. Overall, 46% of postoperative
studies revealed duct stones. The roles for pre and postoperative ERC
are changing and depend greatly on the relative laparoscopic and endos
copic expertise at a given institution.