J. Smith et Er. Laskowski, THE PREPARTICIPATION PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION - MAYO-CLINIC EXPERIENCE WITH 2,739 EXAMINATIONS, Mayo Clinic proceedings, 73(5), 1998, pp. 419-429
Objective: To report the results of preparticipation physical examinat
ion (PPE) performed on 2,739 high school athletes and present a model
for providing PPEs in similar practice settings. Design: We analyzed 2
,739 PPEs performed on high school athletes by means of a station exam
ination approach in our Sports Medicine Center during a 3-year period.
Material and Methods: Personnel from the Departments of Physical Medi
cine and Rehabilitation, Orthopedics, Family Medicine, and Internal Me
dicine participated in performance of a comprehensive station-based ph
ysical examination of high school athletes. The final reviewing physic
ian assigned one of three dispositions to each athlete: cleared for pa
rticipation in sports, not cleared, or cleared with follow-up recommen
ded. Results: On the basis of PPE findings, 53 athletes (1.9%) were di
squalified from participation in sports. Abnormalities that did not pr
eclude participation but necessitated follow-up were identified in ano
ther 327 athletes (11.9%). Musculoskeletal problems were the leading c
ause of restriction from sports activities (43.4%) and the second lead
ing cause for recommended follow-up (27.8%). Clinically significant ca
rdiac abnormalities were noted in only 10 athletes (0.37% of the overa
ll group of students). Our methods and results are discussed in relati
onship to previous PPE studies. Conclusion: On the basis of this study
, me conclude that (1) a Sports Medicine Clinic can efficiently admini
ster PPEs to a large number of athletes by using an adaptable station
approach, (2) the musculoskeletal component of a PPE is an important p
art of the process that often reveals abnormalities and should be perf
ormed by qualified personnel, and (3) each practice must refine its de
livery of PPEs on the basis of its particular environment.