Aj. Stanley et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN THEOPHYLLINE AND SPIRONOLACTONE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CIRRHOTIC ASCITES - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-STUDY, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 12(4), 1998, pp. 389-393
Background: It has been suggested that adenosine is involved in the re
nal haemodynamic and tubular abnormalities observed in cirrhosis, Low-
dose theophylline is an adenosine antagonist and recent studies have s
hown that this drug can improve renal blood now and sodium excretion i
n cirrhotic patients, Methods: Fifteen patients with newly diagnosed c
irrhotic ascites were randomized to receive either 100 mg spironolacto
ne daily for 7 days or 250 mg theophylline on days 1, 2, 4 and 6. Base
line clinical and urinary and serum biochemical data were collected an
d compared following therapy. Results: After 7 days of spironolactone
there were increases in urinary sodium excretion (43.5 +/- 15.6 vs. 10
6.8 +/- 34.7 mmol/day; P < 0.05) and urine volume (769.1 +/- 206.5 vs,
1541.6 +/- 342.6 mL/day; P < 0.05). No changes in the patients' weigh
t, creatinine clearance or serum electrolytes were observed. No change
was detected in any of these parameters following theophylline therap
y, Conclusion: Adenosine antagonism in the form of low-dose theophylli
ne is less efficacious than spironolactone in the management of cirrho
tic ascites.