CANOPY ARCHITECTURE AND MORPHOLOGY OF SWITCHGRASS POPULATIONS DIFFERING IN FORAGE YIELD

Citation
Dd. Redfearn et al., CANOPY ARCHITECTURE AND MORPHOLOGY OF SWITCHGRASS POPULATIONS DIFFERING IN FORAGE YIELD, Agronomy journal, 89(2), 1997, pp. 262-269
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
00021962
Volume
89
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
262 - 269
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-1962(1997)89:2<262:CAAMOS>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Phenotypic selection has been used to improve forage yield and in vitr o dry matter disappearance (IVDMD), but the effects on canopy architec ture and morphology are not understood. Our objectives were to determi ne if canopy architecture and morphology can explain genotype x enviro nment (G x E) yield differences in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) a nd to evaluate canopy architecture and morphology as selection criteri a for increasing yield. This study was conducted in 1993 near Mead, NE , and near Ames, IA. The experimental design was a randomized complete block experiment with a split-plot arrangement of four replicates at each location. Whole plots were tiller population and subplots were sw ard maturity. Tiller populations were harvested on 9 June, 19 July, an d 27 August at Ames and on 10 June, 27 July, and 26 August at Mead and were classified morphologically. Tillers were separated into primary yield components and dried at 55 degrees C to determine total forage y ield and dry matter contribution of morphological components. Genotype x environment interactions occurred for total forage yield and tiller density. Previous phenotypic selection for increased forage yield and IVDMD apparently altered morphological changes within the canopy of s elected switchgrass populations. The most apparent changes were develo pment of additional collared leaves and internodes in some populations across locations. Although canopy architecture may not be a useful se lection criterion because of variability associated with individual ca nopy traits, indirect measurements showed that leaf area index (LAI) h as some potential as a selection criterion for increasing total forage yield. However, selection for individual canopy traits may be most ef fective for modifying sward growth habits.