Ti. Alakokko et al., MATERNAL, FETAL AND PLACENTAL DISTRIBUTION OF LIDOCAINE-EPINEPHRINE AND BUPIVACAINE AFTER EPIDURAL ADMINISTRATION FOR CESAREAN-SECTION, International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 7(2), 1998, pp. 82-87
Bupivacaine and lidocaine are both lipophilic drugs, bupivacaine being
more lipophilic and protein-bound. Our earlier studies, using human p
lacenta perfused in vitro, showed that increased placental binding of
bupivacaine restricts fetal transfer compared to the higher fetal tran
sfer of lidocaine. However, placental tissue concentrations of local a
nesthetics have not been determined in the clinical context. Term part
urients were randomized to receive either 2% lidocaine-epinephrine (n
= 10) or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 10) through a lumbar epidural catheter
for elective cesarean section. Total drug concentrations of lidocaine
and bupivacaine in maternal and umbilical plasma and placental tissue
were determined. There was a higher incidence of maternal hypotension
in the lidocaine-epinephrine group than in the bupivacaine group (7/10
vs 1/10, P < 0.05). At delivery, fetal/maternal ratios for total conc
entrations of lidocaine and bupivacaine were similar (0.49 vs 0.42. Th
e mean placental tissue/maternal plasma concentration ratio of lidocai
ne was higher than that of bupivacaine (1.45 vs 1.01, P < 0.05). The m
ean amount of the drug retained in the placenta per unit of dose (mg/k
g) was also higher in the lidocaine-epinephrine group, although this d
ifference did not reach statistical significance (0.46 mg/unit dose vs
0.40 mg/unit dose). Values for area under the concentration-time curv
es per unit of dose were similar. In conclusion, maternal plasma conce
ntrations, fetal/maternal concentration ratios and placental tissue bi
nding of lidocaine resembled those of bupivacaine after epidural admin
istration. These findings are probably explainable by the effect of ma
ternal hypotension on the distribution of lidocaine.