Cc. Moulin et al., USE OF WEIGHED DIET RECORDS IN THE EVALUATION OF DIETS WITH DIFFERENTPROTEIN CONTENTS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE-2 DIABETES, The American journal of clinical nutrition, 67(5), 1998, pp. 853-857
Compliance with diets containing different amounts of protein was stud
ied in 15 nonobese type 2 diabetes patients (13 males aged 38-69 y). A
method based on interviews and training in the technique of weighed d
iet records was used. Protein intake recorded by the patients was eval
uated on the basis of 24-h nitrogen output (criterion standard measure
ment). Three diets were prescribed in random order, each lasting 4 wk:
usual diet (UD), chicken diet (CD) (both with 1.2-1.5 g protein/kg bo
dy wt), and low-protein diet (LPD; with 0.5-0.8 g protein/kg body wt).
Diets were isoenergetic and similar in fat content. Nutritional statu
s was not altered during the study according to anthropometric indexes
(body mass index, triceps skinfold thickness, midupper arm muscle are
a, and waist-to-hip ratio) and laboratory data (serum albumin, hematoc
rit, and lymphocyte values). The correlation of protein intake recorde
d on the weighed diet records with that estimated by nitrogen output w
as 0.64 for the UD (P = 0.01), 0.79 for the CD (P < 0.001), and 0.66 f
or the LPD (P = 0.008). No difference was found in mean protein intake
(g/kg body wt) calculated from the weighed diet records and nitrogen
output for the UD (1.37 compared with 1.36 g/kg body wt) and CD (1.38
compared with 1.32 g/kg body wt). With the LPD, patients did not consu
me more protein than prescribed, but underreported their actual protei
n intake by 13% (0.68 compared with 0.78 g/kg body wt, P < 0.05). In c
onclusion, the method of weighed diet records was sufficiently accurat
e for assessing protein intake in this sample of type 2 diabetes patie
nts.