BACKGROUND, As more oncology care is moved to the outpatient setting,
the need for a rapid means for oncologists to identify patients with s
ignificant distress has increased. Concurrent with this move has been
the pressure to reduce time spent with each patient, adding to the lik
elihood that a distressed patient will not be recognized and will rema
in untreated in the current health care environment. METHODS. A pilot
program was conducted in a prostate carcinoma oncology clinic to test
the feasibility of a two-stage approach that identifies patients in si
gnificant distress and refers them for treatment. Two pencil and paper
self-report measures were used to detect psychologic distress in pati
ents over the previous week: 1) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Sc
ale (HADS) and 2) ''The Distress Thermometer.'' Patients who scored ab
ove an agreed upon cutoff score on either measure (HADS = 15+; Thermom
eter = 5+) were referred to the psychiatric liaison in the clinic for
evaluation. RESULTS. Compliance in filling out the measures was excell
ent; only 8 of 121 patients (6.6%) refused. Thirty-one percent of eval
uable patients were referred based on elevated scores. Seventeen of 29
patients actually were evaluated. Eight of 17 patients met Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual (of Mental Disorders)-IV criteria for a psychi
atric disorder. CONCLUSIONS. This approach for rapid screening for dis
tress was acceptable in prostate carcinoma patients, although these ol
der men were reluctant to agree to evaluation and treatment. This simp
le screening method needs further testing and the identification of ba
rriers on the part of the patient and oncologist that impede the ident
ification of the most distressed patients. (C) 1998 American Cancer So
ciety.