There are two rival accounts of rational voting in the public choice t
radition: the mainstream instrumental account, that sees the vote as a
revelation of preference over possible electoral outcomes, essentiall
y analogous to a market choice; and the expressive account, that sees
the vote as expressing support for one or other electoral options, rat
her like cheering at a football match. This paper attempts to lay out
some of the implications of the expressive account of voting for the i
ssue of who votes as well as for the nature of political equilibrium,
and to compare these implications with those derived from the instrume
ntal account. We also identify and discuss the alternative views of th
e domain of electoral politics associated with the instrumental and ex
pressive accounts of voting, and sketch a route towards the integratio
n of expressive and instrumental ideas in the analysis of rational ele
ctoral politics.