Objective: In the light of recent legislation, this paper reviews the
implementation of the Community Treatment Order (CTO) in terms of clin
ical efficacy and ethical issues involved in its use. The debate surro
unding the introduction of CTOs in other countries is explored. Method
: A Medline search was conducted and references of recent articles fol
lowed up, with attention to Australian, New Zealand and international
trends. A review of relevant legislation and government reports was co
nducted. Results: There has been limited debate in the Australian and
New Zealand literature concerning the operation of CTOs. Despite their
increasing and widespread use, there is a paucity of research on the
efficacy of CTOs. Concerns about their negative effects on civil liber
ties have been stressed in the United Kingdom and American literature.
Conclusions: If the continued use of CTO is to be justified, both cli
nically and from the civil liberties perspective, controlled research
needs to be carried out to identify whether CTOs are more effective th
an comprehensive assertive community outreach programs in reducing rel
apse rates and hospitalisation, and increasing compliance. Clinical gu
idelines concerning who is most likely to respond to such orders need
to be developed. Alternatives to the CTO are explored, and future dire
ctions in research are outlined.