Aa. Eldalil et al., HEPATITIS-B MARKERS IN HETEROSEXUAL PATIENTS ATTENDING 2 GENITOURINARY MEDICINE CLINICS IN THE WEST-MIDLANDS, Genitourinary medicine, 73(2), 1997, pp. 127-130
Objective: To determine the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infe
ction in heterosexual patients attending two genitourinary medicine (G
UM) clinics in the West Midlands and to examine whether heterosexual a
ctivity is a risk factor for acquiring HBV infection with the view to
extend HBV vaccination policies to cover this group. Design: HBV marke
rs were determined in the GUM study group and compared with that of th
e control groups. Responses to a questionnaire were used to examine se
xual behaviour patterns that may be related to heterosexual acquisitio
n of HBV infection. Setting: The West Midlands, UK April 1992-January
1993. Subjects: 788 male patients and 688 female patients attending GU
M clinics were compared with 498 male blood donors and 563 females att
ending antenatal clinics for the seroprevalence of HBV markers. Potent
ial risk factors related to heterosexual activity were assessed in 143
6 patients in the study group. Main outcome measures: Prevalence of HB
V markers in the GUM study group and the controls. The possible use of
the risk factors examined as predictors for acquiring HBV infection.
Results: The seroprevalence of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) in
GUM patients was 1.9% and 0.5% in the control group. In the study gro
ups the prevalence of anti-HBc from Birmingham was 3.2% while that fro
m Coventry was 0.8%. The low seroprevalence of HBV prevented a multipl
e logistic analysis. A limited regression analysis showed that being n
on-white (p < 0.001) and duration of sexual activity (p = 0.013) were
risk factors for HBV infection. However, these two factors were poor p
redictors of the risk to exposure to HBV infection. Conclusion: The pr
evalence of HBV infection in heterosexual patients in the West Midland
s is very low and does not provide any indications to broaden HBV vacc
ination into heterosexual patients attending GUM clinics. Risk factors
were poor predictors of the exposure to HBV infection. This is partia
lly due to the low prevalence of HBV infection in this study. Further
studies are required before definitive conclusions are made regarding
the potential predictive value of risk factors.