Vlb. Oeilim et al., PATIENT-CONTROLLED VERSUS ANESTHESIOLOGIST-CONTROLLED CONSCIOUS SEDATION WITH PROPOFOL FOR DENTAL TREATMENT IN ANXIOUS PATIENTS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 86(5), 1998, pp. 967-972
In a randomized, cross-over study, we prospectively compared the effic
acy and quality of two methods to achieve conscious sedation with prop
ofol in 11 unpremedicated, anxious dental patients. Each patient under
went two dental procedures, one that was conducted under target-contro
lled infusion (TCI) by the anesthesiologist (ACS), and the other that
used patient-controlled sedation (PCS). The initial target concentrati
on in the ACS mode was 2.5 mu g/mL, which was manipulated in both dire
ctions until the desired clinical end point was achieved. In the PCS m
ode, a 4-mg bolus of propofol (10 mg/mL) was delivered at each activat
ion of the machine, infused over 7 s without a lockout interval. The a
nxious dental patients could induce and maintain conscious sedation wi
th the PCS settings. The mean (range) venous blood propofol concentrat
ions were not significantly different with either mode: ACS 1.8 (0.8-2
.7) mu g/mL and PCS 1.2 (0.2-2.5) mu g/mL. The level of patient satisf
action, quality of sedation, and treatability were not different for e
ither mode of sedation. The intensity of amnesia for intraoperative ev
ents was related to the blood concentrations achieved. Ln the ACS mode
, one patient became unresponsive (sedation level 4) immediately after
the start of sedation. No adverse cardiorespiratory effects resulted
from either mode of propofol sedation. Five patients expressed a stron
g preference for PCS, and three would prefer ACS in the future. The re
sults of the present study suggest that with these PCS settings, a sat
isfactory level of conscious sedation and a high level of patient sati
sfaction was achieved. Implications: In a randomized, cross-over study
, the blood propofol concentrations necessary to achieve conscious sed
ation in anxious dental patients using a target-controlled infusion co
nducted by the anesthesiologist versus patient-controlled sedation wer
e not different. With the patient-controlled sedation settings, a sati
sfactory level of conscious sedation and a high level of patient satis
faction were achieved.