We compared the endotracheal intubating conditions after rocuronium, u
sing the ''timing principle,'' with those after succinylcholine. The t
iming principle entails administration of a single bolus dose of nonde
polarizing muscle relaxant, followed by an induction drug at the onset
of clinical weakness. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to t
hree groups. Patients allocated to Groups 1 and 2 received rocuronium
0.6 mg/kg. At the onset of clinical weakness (onset of ptosis), anesth
esia was induced with thiopental 4-6 mg/kg; intubation was accomplishe
d after 45 s in Group 1 and after 60 s in Group 2. Patients in Group 3
received vecuronium (0.01 mg/kg) 3 min before the administration of t
hiopental and succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg, and their tracheas were intub
ated 60 s later by a blind anesthesiologist. Intubating conditions wer
e assessed according to a grading scale and were either good (5 patien
ts in Groups 1 and 2, 4 patients in Group 3) or excellent (10 patients
in Groups 1 + 2, 11 patients in Group 3) in all patients. Patients we
re interviewed postoperatively, and all were satisfied with the induct
ion of anesthesia. We conclude that rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg provides good
to excellent intubating conditions 45 and 60 s after the induction of
anesthesia using the timing principle. Implications: We compared the
ease with which a breathing tube could be placed in patients using thr
ee techniques. The standard technique (succinylcholine) was compared w
ith two others in which a muscle-relaxing drug (rocuronium) was admini
stered just before the anesthetic drug (so-called timing principle). N
o difference among the techniques was observed.