A. Hsu et al., PHARMACOKINETIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN 2 HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS PROTEASE INHIBITORS, RITONAVIR AND SAQUINAVIR, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 63(4), 1998, pp. 453-464
Objective: To assess the pharmacokinetic interaction between ritonavir
and saquinavir, Methods: Ritonavir and saquinavir were administered i
n single doses to six groups of healthy volunteers in a two-way (saqui
navir alone and ritonavir plus saquinavir for groups I through V) and
a three-way (ritonavir alone, saquinavir alone, and ritonavir plus saq
uinavir for group VI) crossover manner with the following doses: group
I, 200 mg saquinavir and 300 mg ritonavir; group II, 200 mg saquinavi
r and 600 mg ritonavir; group III, 400 mg saquinavir and 300 mg ritona
vir; group IV, 400 mg saquinavir and 600 mg ritonavir; group V, 600 mg
saquinavir and 200 mg ritornavir; group VI, 600 mg saquinavir and 600
mg ritonavir, Results: Coadministration of ritonavir markedly increas
ed the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak c
oncentration of saquinavir (>50-fold and 22-fold, respectively). For a
constant ritonavir dose, the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir were rela
tively proportional to dose. For a constant saquinavir dose, the incre
ase in saquinavir concentration tended to be less than proportional to
ritonavir dose. Ritonavir reduced intersubject variability in the saq
uinavir AUC from 60% to 28%, The in vivo inhibition constant was 0.025
+/- 0.020 mu g/ml with noncompartmental estimation and 0.0164 +/- 0.0
004 mu g/ml with nonlinear mixed-effects model compartmental analysis,
Saquinavir showed no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokin
etics of ritonavir (+6.4% in AUG). The regimens were well tolerated. C
onclusions: The large effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of s
aquinavir is consistent with a large reduction of saquinavir first-pas
s metabolism and postabsorptive clearance. Given the limited bioavaila
bility of saquinavir given in the hard gelatin capsule formulation, th
is drug interaction is expected to have implications in the use of pro
tease inhibitors in the management of human immunodeficiency virus inf
ection.