Fa. Zuckermann et al., REPORT ON THE ANALYSES OF MAB REACTIVE WITH PORCINE CD8 FOR THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL SWINE CD WORKSHOP, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 60(3-4), 1998, pp. 291-303
Based on an analysis of their reactivity with porcine peripheral blood
lymphocytes (PBL), only three of the 57 mAbs assigned to the T cell/a
ctivation marker group were grouped into cluster T9 along with the two
wCD8 workshop standard mAbs 76-2-11 (CD8a) and 11/295/33 (CD8b). Thei
r placement was verified through the use of two-color cytofluorometry
which established that all three mAbs (STH101, #090; UCP1H12-2, #139;
and PG164A, #051) bind exclusively to CD8(+) cells. Moreover, like the
CD8 standard mAbs, these three mAbs reacted with two proteins with a
MW of 33 and 35 kDa from lymphocyte lysates and were, thus, given the
wCD8 designation. Because the mAb STH101 inhibited the binding of mAb
76-2-11 but not of 11/295/33, it was given the wCD8a designation. The
reactivity of the other two new mAbs in the T9 cluster with the variou
s subsets of CD8(+) lymphocytes were distinct from that of the other m
embers in this cluster including the standards. Although the character
istic porcine CD8 staining pattern consisting of CD8(low) and CD8(high
) cells was obtained with the mAb UCP1H12-2: a hider gap between the f
luorescence intensity of the CD8(low) and CD8(high) lymphocytes was ob
served. In contrast, the mAb PG164A, not only exclusively reacted with
CD4(-)/CD8(high) lymphocytes, but it also failed to recognize CD4/CD8
double positive lymphocytes. It was concluded that this mAb is specif
ic for a previously unrecognized CD8 epitope, and was, thus, given the
wCD8c designation. A very similar reactivity pattern to that of PG164
A was observed for two other mAbs (STH106, #094; and SwNL554.1, #009).
Although these two mAbs were not originally positioned in the T cell
subgroup because of their reactivity and their ability to inhibit the
binding of PC164A, they were given the wCD8c designation. Overall, fiv
e new wCD8 mAbs were identified. Although the molecular basis for the
differences in PBL recognition by these mAbs is not yet understood, th
ey will be important in defining the role of CD8(+) lymphocyte subsets
in health and disease. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.