BICYCLO[3.2.1]-DNA, A NEW DNA ANALOG WITH A RIGID BACKBONE AND FLEXIBLY LINKED BASES - PAIRING PROPERTIES WITH COMPLEMENTARY-DNA

Authors
Citation
C. Epple et C. Leumann, BICYCLO[3.2.1]-DNA, A NEW DNA ANALOG WITH A RIGID BACKBONE AND FLEXIBLY LINKED BASES - PAIRING PROPERTIES WITH COMPLEMENTARY-DNA, Chemistry & biology, 5(4), 1998, pp. 209-216
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
10745521
Volume
5
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
209 - 216
Database
ISI
SICI code
1074-5521(1998)5:4<209:BANDAW>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Background: The structural and conformational variety in nucleic acid complexes is largely controlled by the sugar-phosphate backbone. In or der to modulate specific features such as strength or selectivity of c omplex formation by designing nucleotide analogs, a deeper understandi ng of the relationship between mononucleotide structures and the prope rties of their oligomers is necessary. One approach involves comparing the properties of DNA analogs displaying well defined modifications i n their backbone structure with those of natural DNA and RNA. Results: We have designed and synthesized a new DNA analog, 'bicyclo[3.2.1]-DN A', which has a rigid phosphodiester backbone that emulates a B-DNA-ty pe conformation, to which the nucleobases are attached via a flexible open-chain linker. A UV-melting curve analysis shows that bicyclo[3.2. 1]-DNA forms stable duplexes with complementary DNA, although generall y with lower Tm values than pure DNA duplexes. Duplex formation is str ictly constrained to antiparallel complementary sequences, and base-mi smatch discrimination is slightly enhanced compared to pure DNA duplex es. In addition, bicyclo[3.2.1]-DNA sequences are resistant to a 3'-ex onuclease. Conclusions: The furanose unit present in natural nucleosid es is not necessary for a competent and stable phosphodiester-based pa iring system, provided that the backbone is conformationally constrain ed. The information for the preference of antiparallel strand associat ion in B-DNA is not merely a consequence of bases being attached to a specific side of the furanose unit, but is also encoded in the backbon e itself. Furthermore, conformational flexibility in the base-pairing region does not lead to a loss of mismatch in base-pair formation.