In 1996, both Japan and New Zealand adopted new electoral systems with
strong similarities, though also significant differences. In each cas
e the new electoral system entails the election of most MPs by single-
member plurality, while the remainder are elected from lists. The aims
of the reform were less clear, and more party-driven, in Japan than i
n New Zealand. In Japan there is no evidence as yet that 'money politi
cs', or the importance of the individual candidate, have disappeared.
The new systems have had an effect on the internal life of the parties
, especially on candidate selection. The change in the New Zealand sys
tem, as could have been predicted, has led to a great increase in prop
ortionality, but the new Japanese system is actually less proportional
than the previous single non-transferable vote electoral system. The
effect on the New Zealand political system will be major, but the exte
nt of the impact of electoral system change in Japan is not yet clear.