This paper examines the effect of a series of announcements leading to
the approval of risk-based deposit insurance premiums on returns to s
tockholders of commercial banks. Utilizing risk-weighted capital ratio
s and measures of overall risk, we group banks according to one of the
nine-tier insurance categories subsequently defined by the FDIC. Duri
ng the period in which the new insurance system was considered and app
roved, we found that stockholders of ''well-capitalized,'' ''healthy''
banks experienced wealth changes significantly different from those e
xperienced by less than well-capitalized, less than healthy banks. Alt
hough many argued the premium range in the initial insurance schedule
was insufficient, the results show that this initial risk-basing marke
d an important change in the relative burdens imposed by FDIC insuranc
e.