Cs. Cable et al., CONCURRENT ABOMASAL DISPLACEMENT AND PERFORATING ULCERATION IN CATTLE- 21 CASES (1985-1996), Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 212(9), 1998, pp. 1442
Objective-To evaluate the association of physical examination and clin
icopathologic findings with surgical findings in cattle with concurren
t abomasal displacement and perforating ulceration, to determine short
-and long-term survival rates in these cattle, and to determine whethe
r degree of peritonitis (focal vs diffuse) influences survival rates.
Design-Retrospective study. Animals-21 cattle with concurrent abomasal
displacement and perforating ulceration and 42 cattle with uncomplica
ted abomasal displacement. Procedure-Information on signalment, stage
of lactation, physical examination findings, clinicopathologic data, s
urgical diagnosis, procedure(s) performed, and necropsy findings were
retrieved from medical records of all cattle included in this study. D
ifferences between physical examination findings of cattle with concur
rent disease and those of cattle with uncomplicated displacements were
evaluated, as were differences between survival rates in cattle with
focal versus diffuse peritonitis. Results-Cattle with concurrent disea
se had a greater probability of having pneumoperitoneum and signs of a
bdominal pain identified on physical examination than did cattle with
uncomplicated diseases. There was no relationship between clinicopatho
logic data and survival time. Short-term survival rate was 38%, and de
gree of peritonitis significantly influenced survival time in cattle w
ith concurrent abomasal displacement and perforating ulceration. Long-
term survival rate in these cattle was 14%. Clinical Implications-Catt
le with concurrent displaced abomasum and perforating ulceration have
a poor chance for survival. In addition to detection of displaced abom
asum, physical examination findings that can help lead to a presurgica
l diagnosis of this syndrome are pneumoperitoneum and signs of abdomin
al pain.