PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF UROKINASE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR IN PRIMARY BREAST-CARCINOMA - COMPARISON OF 2 IMMUNOASSAY METHODS

Citation
C. Bouchet et al., PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF UROKINASE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR IN PRIMARY BREAST-CARCINOMA - COMPARISON OF 2 IMMUNOASSAY METHODS, British Journal of Cancer, 77(9), 1998, pp. 1495-1501
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00070920
Volume
77
Issue
9
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1495 - 1501
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0920(1998)77:9<1495:PVOUPI>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a potentially important prognostic factor in breast cancer for identifying patients at high ri sk of recurrence. This retrospective study assessed two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods measuring uPA antigen levels in 49 9 primary breast cancer cytosols. Both uPA methods were applied to cyt osols used routinely for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) recepto r assays. uPA was determined using a classical ELISA method (Imubind; American Diagnostica) and a novel automatic immunoluminometric assay ( Lia; Sangtec Medical). The uPA Imubind method revealed about twice as much uPA antigen (median 0.75 ng mg(-1) protein) as the uPA Lia method (median 0.38 ng mg(-1) protein). The correlation coefficient between the two methods was acceptable (r = 0.81), but the two techniques are not interchangeable. Univariate analyses confirmed the poor outcome of patients whose tumours contained large amounts of uPA, regardless of the technique used. Multivariate analyses showed that uPA Imubind and uPA Lia values were both strong independent prognostic factors.