Evidence from 10 studies comparing angiosperm trees and 5 studies comp
aring conifers or differing shade-tolerance was analysed. The number o
f intraphyletic comparisons in which the more shade-tolerant species s
howed the greater relative increase of biomass in elevated CO2 was sig
nificantly higher than would be expected by chance alone. It is sugges
ted that more shade-tolerant species are inherently better disposed. i
n terms of plant architecture and partitioning of biomass and nitrogen
, to utilise resources (light, water, nutrients) that are potentially
limiting in elevated CO2 and that these traitu are responsible for the
interaction between shade-tolerance and CO2 concentration. Compared w
ith less shade-tolerant angiosperm trees, more shade-tolerant angiospe
rm species generally have a lower lear area ratio in ambient CO2 and s
how a smaller relative reduction in elevated CO2. Furthermore, leaf ni
trogen content is usually lower in more shads-tolerant angiosperm spec
ies and tends to be more strongly reduced by elevated CO2 in those spe
cies. Within angiosperm trees, more shade-tolerant species showed a st
ronger stimulation of net leaf photosynthetic I ate in most experiment
s, but this trend was not significant.