THE RISK OF MISSING ANGLE NEOVASCULARIZATION BY OMITTING SCREENING GONIOSCOPY IN ACUTE CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

Citation
Dj. Browning et al., THE RISK OF MISSING ANGLE NEOVASCULARIZATION BY OMITTING SCREENING GONIOSCOPY IN ACUTE CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION, Ophthalmology, 105(5), 1998, pp. 776-784
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01616420
Volume
105
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
776 - 784
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-6420(1998)105:5<776:TROMAN>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of the study was to determine whether angle neo vascularization can occur without pupillary margin neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Design: The study design was a prospective study of the main question and a retrospective study of ancillary issues. Participants: The authors examined 105 eyes of 100 patients with CRVO having clinical evidence of ischemia between July 1 , 1986, and March 18, 1996. Intervention: The authors looked for iris and angle neovascularization with both undilated slit-lamp biomicrosco py and Zeiss four-mirror gonioscopy. Main Outcome Measures: The presen ce of anterior segment neovascularization was measured. Results: Of 34 eyes developing anterior segment neovascularization, 4 (12%) develope d angle neovascularization without pupillary margin neovascularization over a mean follow-up of 2.2 +/- 2.4 standard deviation years. Conclu sions: Angle neovascularization can occur without pupillary margin inv olvement in CRVO, implying the necessity of screening gonioscopy and s upporting the Central Vein Occlusion Study conclusion (based on a phot ographic technique not used clinically).